Political Violence in the Workplace: Managing Election Tensions That Don't End on Election Day
- CrisisWire
- 19 hours ago
- 5 min read
The 2024 presidential election ended months ago, yet workplace violence prevention programs across America face unprecedented challenges as political tensions continue escalating in corporate offices, schools, and government facilities throughout 2025. As detailed in my The Prepared Leader: Threat Assessment, Emergency Planning, and Safety, political violence represents a unique threat category requiring specialized assessment and intervention strategies that most organizations lack.
The Problem Organizations Aren't Talking About
FBI statistics show politically motivated workplace incidents increased 340% between 2020-2024, yet OSHA workplace violence guidelines rarely address political conflict as a specific hazard. My research "How to Conduct an Insider Threat Audit in 10 Steps" (also available on Archive.org and Scribd) demonstrates that politically motivated insider threats follow distinct patterns requiring targeted detection methodologies.
After 40 years protecting lives—from LAPD gang violence investigations to directing security operations at U.S. Embassy Baghdad under daily political attack—I can state unequivocally that political violence in workplaces demands immediate organizational attention as 2025 progresses.
Why 2024 Election Tensions Persist Into 2025
The Secret Service National Threat Assessment Center research on targeted violence proves that political grievances don't resolve with election results—they often intensify. Organizations implementing California SB 553 workplace violence prevention plans must specifically address political conflict as a workplace hazard.
Key factors driving ongoing political workplace violence:
Identity-Based Conflict: Political affiliation has become tribal identity rather than policy preference. As I detail in Threat Assessment Handbook, identity-based threats escalate differently than criminal violence because attackers perceive themselves as righteous defenders rather than criminals.
Social Media Amplification: Employees consume increasingly partisan content outside work, bringing radicalized perspectives into offices. DHS workplace violence research shows social media exposure correlates with workplace political conflict escalation.
Remote Work Isolation: Post-pandemic hybrid workers lack daily interpersonal connection that previously defused tensions. My paper "Executive Protection in 2025: Why ASIS's New Standard Changes Everything" (on Academia.edu, Archive.org, Scribd) addresses remote executive protection including political threats.
Perceived Persecution: Regardless of political affiliation, employees increasingly view workplace policies as politically motivated persecution, creating grievance-fueled violence risk that comprehensive threat assessment programs must identify early.
Warning Signs Your Organization Must Recognize
FEMA IS-906: Workplace Security Awareness training provides foundational threat recognition, but political violence requires specific behavioral indicators detailed in my The Prepared Leader:
Escalating Political Discussions: Employee repeatedly injects politics into workplace conversations despite requests to stop—boundary violations signal potential threat progression.
Dehumanizing Language: Referring to political opponents as "enemies," "traitors," or "evil" rather than people with different views—language predicting violence according to FBI behavioral analysis.
Conspiracy Theory Advocacy: Persistent promotion of QAnon, election denial, or extremist narratives suggesting government/corporate corruption—radicalization indicators requiring behavioral threat assessment intervention.
Weapons Discussion: Casual mentions of firearms ownership, Second Amendment rights, or bringing weapons to work "for protection"—combine with political grievance creates high-risk profile.
Veiled Threats: Comments like "people like you won't be safe much longer" or "when the revolution comes"—ambiguous political threats requiring immediate threat assessment team evaluation per Secret Service protocols.
During my 12 years investigating violent crimes with LAPD and 6+ years protecting diplomats in Baghdad's politically volatile environment (detailed in Uniformed Silence: A Journey Through Security Careers), I learned that political violence follows pathway to violence with identifiable intervention points—if organizations recognize warning signs.
What Your Workplace Violence Prevention Plan Must Include
California employers implementing SB 553 compliance and organizations following OSHA workplace violence standards nationwide must address political violence specifically:
1. Political Harassment Policies
Standard harassment policies address protected classes (race, gender, religion) but rarely political affiliation. Comprehensive workplace violence prevention requires explicit policies prohibiting political intimidation, documented in Cal/OSHA compliance frameworks.
2. De-escalation Training for Political Conflict
Supervisors need specialized training addressing political discussions differently than other workplace conflicts. My workplace violence prevention training programs include political conflict de-escalation scenarios aligned with ASIS International workplace violence standards.
3. Threat Assessment Integration
Political grievances must trigger behavioral threat assessment protocols, not just HR discipline. As outlined in Threat Assessment Handbook, multidisciplinary teams must evaluate political rhetoric for violence indicators using FBI threat assessment frameworks.
4. Social Media Monitoring Policies
Employees expressing violent political rhetoric online may pose workplace threats. My research "How to Conduct an Insider Threat Audit in 10 Steps" provides legally defensible social media monitoring frameworks balancing employee privacy with organizational safety.
5. Physical Security Considerations
Political violence often targets facilities representing opposing ideologies. Physical security assessments using Locked Down: The Access Control Playbook methodologies must evaluate political targeting risk, especially for government facilities, media organizations, and politically-associated corporations.
High-Risk Industries Requiring Immediate Action
Government Agencies: Public-facing employees experience political harassment daily. FEMA IS-915: Protecting Critical Infrastructure addresses politically motivated attacks on government facilities requiring comprehensive emergency planning.
Healthcare Facilities: Politically charged issues (vaccines, abortion, gender-affirming care) create staff threats. Healthcare workplace violence prevention must address Title 8 CCR 3342 requirements plus political violence risk.
Education Institutions: School board meetings, curriculum debates, and DEI policies generate politically motivated threats to educators. My book Campus Under Siege: School Safety Strategies addresses political violence in educational settings requiring specialized threat assessment approaches.
Media Organizations: Journalists face unprecedented political harassment and violence threats. Executive protection programs detailed in "Executive Protection in 2025" must address journalist-specific political violence.
Tech Companies: Content moderation policies make tech workers political targets. Insider threat programs must evaluate politically motivated data theft or sabotage.
What You Must Do Now
Organizations cannot ignore political workplace violence hoping tensions diminish. CDC workplace violence research and DHS threat analysis project continued escalation through 2025 and beyond.
Immediate actions:
Conduct political violence risk assessment using frameworks from The Prepared Leader
Update workplace violence prevention plans to address political conflict specifically—free consultation available
Train threat assessment teams on political violence indicators per Secret Service NTAC research
Review physical security for political targeting vulnerabilities through professional security assessments
Establish reporting mechanisms for political harassment and veiled threats
Political violence in workplaces represents preventable tragedy when organizations implement evidence-based threat assessment and intervention programs. After 40 years protecting lives across violent environments from South Central LA to Baghdad's Green Zone, I've learned that warning signs always exist—organizations just need trained eyes to see them.
Don't wait for your organization to make headlines. Schedule your free workplace violence assessment today.
Additional resources available on the CrisisWire blog and YouTube training channel.
About the Author
Warren Pulley is founder of CrisisWire Threat Management Solutions and brings 40 years protecting lives across USAF security operations, LAPD violent crimes investigation, U.S. Embassy Baghdad security operations, and campus police leadership. BTAM-certified with 20+ FEMA certifications. Author of five books on threat assessment and security including The Prepared Leader, Threat Assessment Handbook, and Campus Under Siege. Published research available on Academia.edu.
Comments